Common intention implies a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the plan. Common intention comes into being prior to the commission of the act, which need not be a long gap. To bring common intention into effect a pre-concert is not necessarily be proved, but it may well develop on the spot as between a number of persons and could be inferred from facts and circumstances of each case. For example A and B caught hold of C where only B stabbed C with a knife but A is also liable for murder as there was a pre concerted action. In the case Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad, Supreme court emphasized on this point that prior concert need not be something always very much prior to the incident, but could well be something that may develop on the spot, on the spur of the moment.
Common Intention and Similar Intention
Common intention does not mean similar intention of several persons. To constitute common intention it is necessary that the intention of each one of them be known to the rest of them and shared by them. In the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at the same time….the distinction between a common intention and similar intention may be fine, but is nonetheless a real one and if overlooked, may lead to miscarriage of justice….” The mere presence of accused together is not sufficient to hold that they shared the common intention to commit the offence in question. It is necessary that the intention of each one of ‘several persons’ be known to each other for constituting common intention.
A gang of six members went to a bank, armed with weapons to commit a heist. While five of the gang members went inside the bank, Mr. A (the sixth member) waited outside the bank to alert them on any threat. During the heist one of the gang members fired a gun at the branch manager, as a result he died. All five escaped but Mr. A was caught and arrested. Now, choose the most appropriate option as per the principle stated in the above passage.
Correct Answer :
Mr. A along with all other members of the gang are liable for murder as there was common intention.
Solution :
Correct Answer: Mr. A along with all other members of the gang are liable for murder as there was common intention.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Understanding Common Intention vs. Similar Intention:
Based on the provided passage, common intention requires a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to that plan. Common intention can either be formed prior to the act or can develop on the spot at the spur of the moment. To establish common intention, the intention of each person involved must be known to and shared by the rest of them.
2. Analyzing the Facts of the Case:
- A gang of six members went together, armed with weapons, to commit a bank heist.
- Five members entered the bank to carry out the heist, while Mr. A stayed outside to act as a lookout to alert them to any threat.
- During the execution of their joint plan, one member shot and killed the branch manager.
- Mr. A was caught, while the others escaped.
3. Applying the Principle to the Facts:
Mr. A participated in a pre-arranged, concerted plan to commit a heist with armed weapons. By acting as the lookout, Mr. A actively facilitated the commission of the offence in furtherance of their shared goal. Since all six gang members went armed to commit a heist, the act of using violence (firing a gun) during the robbery falls within the scope of their shared common intention.
Conclusion:
Even though Mr. A did not physically pull the trigger and was standing outside the bank, he shared the common intention to commit the armed heist. Therefore, Mr. A, along with all other gang members, is liable for murder.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.