Consider the given statement and the two conclusions that follow:

Statement:

Morning walk is good for health.

Conclusions:

1. All healthy people go for morning walk.

2. Morning walk is essential for maintaining good health.

What is/are the valid conclusion/ conclusions?

Correct Answer: Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation:

Let us analyze the given statement and evaluate each conclusion step-by-step:

Statement: Morning walk is good for health.

This statement highlights a beneficial activity (morning walk) for overall health, but it does not state that it is the only way or a compulsory requirement to stay healthy.

Evaluating Conclusion 1: "All healthy people go for morning walk."

The word "All" makes this an extreme generalization. While morning walk is good for health, healthy people might maintain their health through other forms of exercise or habits (such as swimming, gym workouts, or yoga). Therefore, Conclusion 1 does not logically follow.

Evaluating Conclusion 2: "Morning walk is essential for maintaining good health."

The word "essential" implies that without a morning walk, maintaining good health is impossible. The statement merely says it is "good for health", not that it is indispensable or essential. Thus, Conclusion 2 does not logically follow.

Since neither conclusion logically follows from the given statement, the correct answer is Neither 1 nor 2.