Directions (71-73): In the question below three statements are given followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
Only a few Chess is Carrom.
Some Carrom is Ludo.
Mostly Ludo is Monopoly.
Conclusions:
I. All Carrom can be Chess.
II. Some Monopoly can be Chess.

The correct option is Both conclusions I and II follow.

Let us analyze the given statements step-by-step:

1. Statements Analysis:
- "Only a few Chess is Carrom" means: Some Chess is Carrom, and Some Chess is NOT Carrom.
- "Some Carrom is Ludo" means: There is an intersection/overlap between Carrom and Ludo.
- "Mostly Ludo is Monopoly" means: Some Ludo is Monopoly.

2. Evaluating Conclusion I:
- Conclusion I: "All Carrom can be Chess."
- The restriction "Only a few Chess is Carrom" implies that all Chess cannot be Carrom. However, there is no restriction preventing all Carrom from being inside Chess. Therefore, it is entirely possible for all Carrom to be a part of Chess.
- Thus, Conclusion I follows (as a possibility).

3. Evaluating Conclusion II:
- Conclusion II: "Some Monopoly can be Chess."
- There is no direct negative relation or restriction given between Monopoly and Chess. Hence, a possibility exists where Monopoly intersects with Chess.
- Thus, Conclusion II follows (as a possibility).

Therefore, both conclusions I and II logically follow.