Question Details

Based on the mathematical statements provided below, assume they are correct and evaluate which of the two conclusions (I and II) is or are definitely valid.

Statements:
W < M = J ≤ A < X; Z > Q ≥ J ≤ V
Conclusions:
I. Q ≥ W
II. X > V

Options

A

Only conclusion II is logically valid

B

Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II is logically valid

C

Only conclusion I is logically valid

D

Either conclusion I or conclusion II is logically valid

E

Both conclusions I and II are logically valid

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II is logically valid

Solution :

Correct Answer: Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II is logically valid


Step-by-Step Explanation:

Let us analyze the given mathematical statements and evaluate each conclusion step-by-step.


Given Statements:

W<M=JA<X

Z>QJV


Evaluating Conclusion I: QW

To connect Q and W, we use the common element J:

From the second statement: QJ

From the first statement: W<M=J, which means J>W

Combining these gives: QJ>W

Since there is a strict inequality sign (>) between J and W, the combined relation between Q and W must be Q>W.

Therefore, the conclusion QW is false (it should strictly be Q>W).


Evaluating Conclusion II: X>V

To connect X and V, we use the common element J:

From the first statement: JA<X, which means X>AJ

From the second statement: JV

Here, we have X>J and VJ. Since both X and V are greater than or equal to J, there is no definite relationship between X and V (opposing/independent relationship directions from J).

Therefore, Conclusion II (X>V) is not logically valid.


Conclusion:

Since both conclusions are invalid, the correct choice is Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II is logically valid.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...