Question Details

In the middle of a pandemic, the geopolitics of the world‘s most troubled region took a historic turn this week, when the UAE and Israel, under the benevolent gaze of US President Donald Trump, signed an agreement to ―normalise‖ relations. The deal opens up new opportunities for India to play a much larger role in the regional security and stability in the Gulf, where New Delhi enjoys special relations with both Abu Dhabi and Jerusalem. The barebones of the deal envisages establishing regular diplomatic relations between the UAE, the rising influential power in the Gulf, and Israel, the ―Incredible Hulk‖ of the region, but a country officially not on speaking terms with most of its Arab neighbours. In his first tweet, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed said: ‗During a call with President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu, an agreement was reached to stop further Israeli annexation of Palestinian territories. The UAE and Israel also agreed to cooperation and setting a roadmap towards establishing a bilateral relationship.‖ In return, Israel agreed to ―suspend‖ its annexation plans for West Bank that would have been deeply destabilising. Benjamin Netanyahu gets a diplomatic victory, which may be short - lived, given the nature of Israeli politics. But Israel gets a diplomatic and economic opening with the big power in the Gulf that could open other doors, give its security interests legitimacy and, perhaps, open the door to Middle East peace.

Many of the other Arab powers, such as Oman, Bahrain, Egypt and Jordan, apart from the big global powers, and India, have welcomed the deal. Iran has slammed it, as have Turkey and Syria. Saudi Arabia has been very quiet. Given the close ties between Mohammed bin Zayed and Mohammed bin Salman, it is unthinkable that KSA was not consulted, particularly when the US is the third pole in this agreement. The deal gives UAE pole position as the premier Gulf Arab power, with diplomatic leverage with Israel and the US. ―This deal is about positioning in Washington, DC,‖ said James Dorsey, Gulf and Middle East expert.

Source: Excerpt from the Economic Times, written by Indrani Bagchi. (Dated – 16th August, 2020)

Which of the following is true in relation to the stake of Palestine in the peace deal between UAE and Israel?

Options

A

Israel has recognised Palestine as an Independent Nation.

B

This can be an opportunity for the Palestine to establish diplomatic relations with Israel.

C

The deal marks both a win and setback to the Israel-Palestine relations.

D

A peace treaty would also be signed between Israel and Palestine.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option C

The deal marks both a win and setback to the Israel-Palestine relations.

Solution :

The correct answer is Option 3: The deal marks both a win and setback to the Israel-Palestine relations.


Step-by-step Explanation:

1. Analyzing the passage:
The provided text highlights key aspects of the normalization agreement between the UAE and Israel:

  • The Win/Positive aspect: Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed stated that as part of the agreement, Israel agreed to "stop further Israeli annexation of Palestinian territories" and "suspend its annexation plans for West Bank that would have been deeply destabilising." This suspension of annexation represents a victory or protection for Palestinian territorial claims in the short term.
  • The Setback aspect: Simultaneously, an Arab nation (UAE) established full bilateral and diplomatic relations with Israel without requiring a finalized peace treaty or statehood resolution for Palestine, altering the traditional Arab consensus and diplomatic position regarding Palestine. Thus, it also reflects a complex dynamic of wins and setbacks for Israel-Palestine relations.

2. Evaluating the Options:

  • Option 1: "Israel has recognised Palestine as an Independent Nation." – Incorrect. The passage mentions only that Israel agreed to suspend West Bank annexation plans, not that it recognized Palestine as an independent nation.
  • Option 2: "This can be an opportunity for the Palestine to establish diplomatic relations with Israel." – Incorrect. The passage focuses on the UAE and Israel setting a roadmap for bilateral relations, not Palestine.
  • Option 3: "The deal marks both a win and setback to the Israel-Palestine relations."Correct. It served as a win by halting immediate West Bank annexation while representing a setback in traditional Arab diplomatic solidarity for Palestinian statehood requirements prior to normalization.
  • Option 4: "A peace treaty would also be signed between Israel and Palestine." – Incorrect. The text does not mention any signed peace treaty between Israel and Palestine.

Therefore, the correct statement is Option 3.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...