Question Details

Directions: Analyze the set of statements provided below and determine which of the conclusions logically follows, even if they contradict widely accepted facts.

Statements:
Only a few Cameras are Laptops
Some Watches are Backpacks
No Laptops are Backpacks

Conclusions:
I. Some Cameras are not Backpacks
II. All Cameras can never be Watches

Options

A

If only conclusion II follows

B

If only conclusion I follows

C

If either conclusion I or II follows

D

If both conclusions I and II follow

E

If neither conclusion I nor II follows

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

If only conclusion I follows

Solution :

Correct Answer: If only conclusion I follows


Step-by-Step Explanation:


1. Breakdown of Given Statements:
- Statement 1: "Only a few Cameras are Laptops"
The phrase "Only a few" translates to two definite facts:
(i) Some Cameras are Laptops.
(ii) Some Cameras are NOT Laptops.
This means there exists a specific portion of Cameras that overlap with Laptops.

- Statement 2: "Some Watches are Backpacks"
This means there is an intersection between the set of Watches and the set of Backpacks.

- Statement 3: "No Laptops are Backpacks"
This means the set of Laptops and the set of Backpacks are completely disjoint (they have 0 overlap).


2. Evaluating Conclusion I: "Some Cameras are not Backpacks"
- From Statement 1, we know that a portion of Cameras are Laptops.
- From Statement 3, we know that no Laptops can ever be Backpacks.
- Therefore, the specific Cameras that are Laptops can never be Backpacks.
- This proves beyond doubt that at least some Cameras (the ones that are Laptops) are definitely not Backpacks.
- Thus, Conclusion I logically follows.


3. Evaluating Conclusion II: "All Cameras can never be Watches"
- "Can never be" implies a definite impossibility (i.e., it claims that it is impossible for all Cameras to be Watches).
- Looking at the statements, there is no direct or indirect restriction between Cameras and Watches.
- It is entirely possible for all Cameras to be inside the set of Watches without violating any given statements.
- Since it is possible for all Cameras to be Watches, the claim that they "can never be Watches" is false.
- Thus, Conclusion II does not follow.


Final Verdict:
Only Conclusion I logically follows from the given statements. Therefore, the correct choice is If only conclusion I follows.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • SSC
  • intermediate
  • 1 hour
  • english, general awareness, general intelligence and reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • SSC
  • intermediate
  • 1 hour
  • english, general awareness, general intelligence and reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...