Question Details

Legal Principle: In the law of evidence, a person missing for long and not heard of, for over seven years is presumed to have died.

Facts: A, B and C are children of F and M. At the age of 20, A went out in search of a job and was not contacting the family. All attempts to trace A by the family failed. Eight years after the death of the parents, B and C entered into a partition and took equal share in the property of F and M. One year after this, A returned home with his wife and two children and claimed his share in the property. Whether A’s claim is legally sustainable?

Options

A

Since A was not heard of, for more than eight years, the legal presumption of death will apply and hence, he cannot claim a share in the property.

B

It was A’s duty to be in touch with the family at least once in a year. The failure of this duty will disentitle him from claiming property.

C

A will succeed because he is a legitimate son of F and M.

D

B and C are legally bound to give 13rd share of the property to A.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option A

Since A was not heard of, for more than eight years, the legal presumption of death will apply and hence, he cannot claim a share in the property.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...