Let f (t) be a real-valued function whose second derivative is positive for Which of the following is/are always true ?
Correct Answer :
f (t) cannot have two distinct local minima
Solution :
The correct option is f (t) cannot have two distinct local minima.
Let us analyze the properties of the function given the condition on its second derivative.
We are given that the second derivative of the real-valued function is strictly positive for all real numbers :
A function whose second derivative is strictly positive on an interval is strictly convex on that interval.
One of the fundamental properties of a strictly convex function is that any local minimum is also a unique global minimum. Consequently, a strictly convex function cannot have more than one local minimum.
To prove this mathematically, suppose for contradiction that has two distinct local minima at and (where ).
Since these are local minima of a differentiable function, the first derivative must vanish at these points:
However, since for all , the first derivative must be a strictly increasing function on the entire real line.
If is strictly increasing and , we must have:
This contradicts our assumption that .
Therefore, cannot have two distinct local minima.
Let us briefly check why the other options are not always true:
1. f (t) has at least one local minimum: This is not always true. For example, the function has everywhere, but it has no local minimum anywhere on the real line.
2. f (t) has at least one local maximum: A strictly convex function cannot have any local maximum since rule out the second-order condition for a maximum.
3. The minimum value of f (t) cannot be negative: This is false. Consider the function , which has but has a negative minimum value of at .
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.