Question Details

Marriage is necessarily the basis of social organisation and the foundation of important legal rights and obligations. The importance and imperative character of the institution of marriage needs no comment. In Hindu law, marriage is treated as a Samskara or a sacrament. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 introduced monogamy as a law of marriage among Hindus by virtue of Section 5 clause (i) which is essentially the voluntary union for life of one man with one woman to the exclusion of all others. It enacts , “neither party must have a spouse living at the time of marriage”. The expression ‘spouse’ here used, means a lawfully married husband or wife. Before a valid marriage can be solemnised, both parties to such marriage must be either single or divorced or a widow or a widower and only then they are competent to enter into a valid marriage. If at the time of performance of the marriage rites and ceremonies, one or other of the parties had a spouse living and the earlier marriage had not already been set aside, the later marriage is no marriage at all.

The Supreme Court in Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra , [AIR 1965 SC 1564 ] held, “Prima facie , the expression ‘whoever marries’ in Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (which defines the offence of bigamy) must mean ‘whoever marries validly’ or ‘whoever marries and whose marriage is a valid one’. If marriage is not valid according to the law applicable to the parties, no question arises of its being void by reason of its taking place during the life of the husband or wife of the person marrying. One of the conditions of a valid marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 is that it must be ‘solemnised’. Further, Section 13 (2) of the Act provides for grounds of divorce to wife and states, “A wife may also present a petition for the dissolution of her marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground that in the case of any marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act, that the husband had married again before such commencement or that any other wife of the husband married before such commencement was alive at the time of the solemnization of the marriage of the petitioner: Provided that in either case the other wife is alive at the time of the presentation of the petition”.


Mr. P , a 28-year old male Hindu was legally married to Ms. Q , a 26-year old female Hindu. Mr. P converts to Islam to marry Ms. N , a 30-year old Sunni female Muslim. Consider the statement and decide whether Ms. Q has the remedy to file a complaint for the offence of bigamy against Mr. P?

Options

A

Yes, Ms. Q can file a complaint subject to the approval by Ms. N.

B

No, Ms. Q cannot file a complaint as it defeats the very purpose of her marriage with Mr. P.

C

No, Ms. Q cannot file a complaint as Mr. P converted to another religion and the offence of bigamy will only be attracted when the parties are Hindus.

D

Yes, Ms. Q has the remedy of filing a complaint for the offence of bigamy.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option D

Yes, Ms. Q has the remedy of filing a complaint for the offence of bigamy.

Solution :

Correct Answer: Yes, Ms. Q has the remedy of filing a complaint for the offence of bigamy.


Step-by-Step Explanation:


1. Understanding the Legal Framework:
Under Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, monogamy is a legal condition for a valid marriage among Hindus. Neither party must have a spouse living at the time of the marriage. A marriage solemnized while a previous spouse is alive remains invalid and legally void.


2. Conversion and Bigamy:
According to established law (notably affirmed by the Supreme Court in landmark cases such as Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India), a marriage solemnized under Hindu law cannot be automatically dissolved simply because one of the spouses converts to another religion (such as Islam). Since the first marriage between Mr. P and Ms. Q remains subsisting and legally valid, contracting a second marriage during the subsistence of the first valid marriage attracts the offence of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).


3. Conclusion:
Thus, Mr. P's conversion does not grant him immunity from prosecution for bigamy committed against his legal wife, Ms. Q. Ms. Q retains the full legal right and remedy to file a complaint for the offence of bigamy against Mr. P.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...