Marriage is necessarily the basis of social organisation and the foundation of important legal rights and obligations. The importance and imperative character of the institution of marriage needs no comment. In Hindu law, marriage is treated as a Samskara or a sacrament. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 introduced monogamy as a law of marriage among Hindus by virtue of Section 5 clause (i) which is essentially the voluntary union for life of one man with one woman to the exclusion of all others. It enacts , “neither party must have a spouse living at the time of marriage”. The expression ‘spouse’ here used, means a lawfully married husband or wife. Before a valid marriage can be solemnised, both parties to such marriage must be either single or divorced or a widow or a widower and only then they are competent to enter into a valid marriage. If at the time of performance of the marriage rites and ceremonies, one or other of the parties had a spouse living and the earlier marriage had not already been set aside, the later marriage is no marriage at all.
The Supreme Court in Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra , [AIR 1965 SC 1564 ] held, “Prima facie , the expression ‘whoever marries’ in Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (which defines the offence of bigamy) must mean ‘whoever marries validly’ or ‘whoever marries and whose marriage is a valid one’. If marriage is not valid according to the law applicable to the parties, no question arises of its being void by reason of its taking place during the life of the husband or wife of the person marrying. One of the conditions of a valid marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 is that it must be ‘solemnised’. Further, Section 13 (2) of the Act provides for grounds of divorce to wife and states, “A wife may also present a petition for the dissolution of her marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground that in the case of any marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act, that the husband had married again before such commencement or that any other wife of the husband married before such commencement was alive at the time of the solemnization of the marriage of the petitioner: Provided that in either case the other wife is alive at the time of the presentation of the petition”.
Which of the following is not correct regarding the law of monogamy among Hindus?
Correct Answer :
Monogamy as a law was abolished after 1955.
Solution :
The correct statement that is not correct regarding the law of monogamy among Hindus is: Monogamy as a law was abolished after 1955.
Detailed Explanation and Legal Analysis:
1. Enactment of Monogamy: As stated in the provided text, Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 explicitly introduced monogamy as a statutory rule among Hindus by enacting that "neither party must have a spouse living at the time of marriage." Thus, monogamy was legally mandated, not abolished, by the Act of 1955.
2. Analysis of Other Options:
- Monogamy provides social and legal recognition: True, as marriage forms the foundation of legal rights and social organisation.
- Validity of second marriage: True, any second marriage solemnised during the lifetime of a living spouse is void under the Act.
- Offence of Bigamy: Bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code applies equally to both husband and wife if a valid second marriage is solemnised during the subsistence of a prior valid marriage.
Therefore, the assertion that monogamy was abolished after 1955 is incorrect, making it the right choice for the question asked.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.