Passage
The Editors Guild of India has expressed concern over the “draconian provisions” of the Press and Registration of Periodicals (PRP) Bill, 2023, that can have an adverse impact on freedom of the press. The Guild added: “Editors Guild of India would like the proposed bill to ensure that publishing of news in India remains free of encumbrances and intrusive checks on publishers by the Registrar, and that the primary emphasis of the Registrar and the PRP remains ‘registration’ and not ‘regulation’, as the latter has the potential of restricting freedom of the press.”
“In the definitions section, the term ‘specified authority’ gives power to government agencies beyond the Press Registrar, to conduct the functions of the Registrar, which could even include police and other law enforcement agencies. Given the intrusive, expansive, and vague nature of powers that the bill in any case allows to the Press Registrar, the power to further delegate this power to other government agencies including law enforcement agencies is deeply distressing,” the Guild said.
The statement says sections 4(1) and 11(4) allow the Registrar to deny the right to bring out a periodical and cancel the certificate of registration of a periodical to persons convicted of “terrorist act or unlawful activity” or “for having done anything against the security of the State”.
“Interestingly, the PRB Act, 1867, had no such provisions. Given the liberal and arbitrary use of UAPA (which is the basis for defining ‘terrorist act’ and ‘unlawful activity’), as well as other criminal laws, including sedition, against journalists and media organisations to suppress freedom of speech, the Guild is deeply concerned by the introduction of these new provisions, and the way they can be misused to deny the right to bring out news publications to persons who are critical of governments,” it said.
Among the other worrisome provisions listed by the Guild is Section 6(b), which gives power to the Press Registrar (as well as any other “specified authority”) to enter the premises of a periodical to “inspect or take copies of the relevant records or documents or ask any questions necessary for obtaining any information required to be furnished”.
Who among the following is not eligible to publish a periodical as per the PRP Bill?
Correct Answer :
Mr. A convicted of waging war against Government of India.
Solution :
The correct option is Mr. A convicted of waging war against Government of India.
Step-by-step Explanation:
1. Analyze the passage requirement:
According to paragraph 3 of the passage, sections 4(1) and 11(4) of the PRP Bill allow the Registrar to deny the right to bring out a periodical (or cancel the certificate of registration) to persons who are convicted of a "terrorist act or unlawful activity" or "for having done anything against the security of the State".
2. Evaluate each candidate's status:
• Mr. A: He is convicted of waging war against the Government of India (an act against the security of the State). Because he has been convicted, he is explicitly barred under the bill from publishing a periodical.
• Mr. B and Mr. C: They are only accused (not convicted) of unlawful or terrorist activities. The passage specifies that the disqualification applies to persons convicted, not merely accused.
Conclusion:
Therefore, only Mr. A is ineligible to publish a periodical as per the PRP Bill, making the first option the correct answer.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.