Question Details

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Same-sex marriage has no legal recognition in India as per the recent Supreme Court’s judgment, where it was decided that this is an issue for Parliament to address. While Hindu marriages between transgender persons and cisgender men are permissible, and the Court acknowledged systemic discrimination and the right to choose a partner, it held that there is no fundamental right to marry. The government has been urged to form a panel to consider granting more legal rights to same-sex couples, but the legal status of marriage remains unchanged for now. The five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty &Anr. v. Union of India (2023), in a majority verdict, ruled that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Indian Constitution, making it beyond the court’s scope to legislate on same-sex marriage. The Court stated that the power to legislate on same-sex marriage rests with the Parliament and state legislatures. The judgment affirmed constitutional rights for LGBTQ+ citizens and the right to choose a partner. The government agreed to set up a panel to explore legal rights and benefits for same-sex couples, though these benefits are not the same as those conferred by marriage.


Same-sex couples cannot legally marry and do not receive the same legal rights, such as automatic inheritance, pension, or adoption rights, that legally married couples do.Despite the ruling, LGBTQ+ couples continue to face legal discrimination and have no social recognition of marriage. The Court affirmed the right of same-sex couples to cohabit privately. While the Supreme Court’s verdict brought limited benefits and acknowledgments, it has not legalized same-sex marriage in India, deferring the ultimate decision to the Parliament. (279 words)

[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from ”The Hindu”, dated 27th October 2023]


In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a same-sex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court’s ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?

Options

A

Their marriage is legally recognized nationwide under a new constitutional right

B

Their marriage is not legally recognized, as the Supreme Court ruled that this issue is for Parliament to address

C

Their marriage is recognized only if both of them identify as transgender

D

Their marriage is temporarily recognized until Parliament decides otherwise

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

Their marriage is not legally recognized, as the Supreme Court ruled that this issue is for Parliament to address

Solution :

Correct Answer: Their marriage is not legally recognized, as the Supreme Court ruled that this issue is for Parliament to address


Explanation:

According to the provided passage detailing the Supreme Court’s judgment in Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India (2023), same-sex marriage currently has no legal recognition in India.


The Court held that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Indian Constitution and decided that the power to legislate on same-sex marriage rests with Parliament and state legislatures, making it beyond the court’s scope to legalize it.


Therefore, Ramesh and Sameer's marriage cannot be legally recognized at present, as the Supreme Court ruled that this issue is for Parliament to address.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...