Statement:

Should personal laptops be restricted during corporate board meetings?

Arguments:

I. Yes, they distract attendees from active participation.

II. No, they allow instant access to essential files during urgent queries.

The correct option is Both I and II are strong.

Explanation:
An argument is considered strong if it is relevant, practical, and directly addresses the core issue of the statement.

1. Argument I: "Yes, they distract attendees from active participation."
This argument is strong because laptops can lead to multitasking, checking emails, or browsing unrelated content during board meetings, thereby reducing active listening and active engagement in high-level discussions.

2. Argument II: "No, they allow instant access to essential files during urgent queries."
This argument is also strong because corporate board meetings frequently involve complex financial metrics, legal documents, and detailed reports. Being able to access these documents immediately on a laptop allows attendees to answer critical questions and make informed decisions without delay.

Since both arguments present logical, practical, and highly relevant points from opposing perspectives, both I and II are strong.