Question Details

Statements: All browser is app

Only a few design is app

No design is template

Conclusions: I. No browser is template

II. All design can never be app

In each question below some statements are given followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give an answer.

Options

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Either conclusion I or II follows

D

Neither conclusion I nor II follows

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

Only conclusion II follows

Solution :

To determine which of the conclusions follow, let us analyze the given statements step-by-step:

1. "All browser is app":
This indicates that the entire category of "browser" is a subset of "app". Any browser is automatically an app.

2. "Only a few design is app":
In syllogisms, the phrase "only a few" contains two definite implications:
Some design is app (there is an intersection between design and app).
Some design is not app (a portion of design must always lie outside of app).

3. "No design is template":
This means that the sets of "design" and "template" are completely disjoint, meaning they have no elements in common.

Now, let us evaluate the given conclusions based on these statements:

Conclusion I: "No browser is template"
We know that all browsers are apps, and no designs are templates. However, there is no statement that restricts the relationship between the set of "browser" and the set of "template". Since a relationship between them is possible, we cannot say with absolute certainty that "No browser is template". Therefore, Conclusion I does not definitely follow.

Conclusion II: "All design can never be app"
The phrase "can never be" represents impossibility. Thus, "All design can never be app" means "It is impossible for all designs to be apps".
From Statement 2 ("Only a few design is app"), we know for certain that "Some design is not app". Because there is always a part of "design" that cannot be "app", it is impossible for the entirety of "design" to ever become "app". Therefore, the statement that all design can never be app is correct. Thus, Conclusion II definitely follows.

Consequently, only conclusion II follows.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...