Question Details

Tension prevailed in the Jawahar area in Palghar district after three Mumbai residents, travelling in a Ford Ecosport to Silvassa, were allegedly lynched late on Thursday night. The Kasa police said the incident occurred near Gadakchinchale village under their jurisdiction.

Information received by us indicates that the three occupants of the SUV hailed form Kandivali in Mumbai and were going to attend a funeral in Silvassa,‖ Superintendent of Police Gaurav Singh, Palghar police said. A large mob of villagers surrounded the car within a matter of minutes and started attacking it with sticks, irons rods and their bare hands, leading to the death of all three occupants. ―One of our patrolling vehicles later spotted the severely injured trio lying on the road and stopped to find out the matter. However, our team was also attacked by the mob and the vehicle pelted with stones. Our personnel had to flee and were unable to rescue to the victims, ‖ an officer with the Kasa police said. A wireless alert was sent out later apprising all police stations and units of the incident following which reinforcements were sent to the village and a combing operation was undertaken. ―Prima facie information indicates that the trio were mistaken for thieves and attacked. The villagers were on edge due to the ongoing lockdown and unavailability of essential supplies. For the past few days, several rumours have been doing the rounds on social media about thieves and dacoits targetting villages on the highway. As a result, villagers have been patrolling the highway and stopping late night travellers on suspicion,‖ the officer said.

Assertion (A): Mob Lynching can be justified only in circumstances where the religious sentiments or feelings of a large group of people is associated.
Reason (R): Religious sentiments and feelings are of paramount consideration for the state and should not be interfered with.

Options

A

Both (A) and (R) are correct

B

(A) is correct but (R) is incorrect

C

Both (A) and (R) are incorrect

D

(A) is incorrect but (R) is correct.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option C

Both (A) and (R) are incorrect

Solution :

The correct option is Both (A) and (R) are incorrect.


Analysis of Assertion (A):
Assertion (A) states that mob lynching can be justified under certain circumstances involving religious sentiments. In a legal and constitutional society governed by the rule of law, extrajudicial killings or mob violence (lynching) can never be justified under any circumstances, regardless of religious, emotional, or social sentiments. Violence by a mob directly violates human rights and fundamental constitutional guarantees such as the right to life and fair process. Therefore, Assertion (A) is completely incorrect.


Analysis of Reason (R):
Reason (R) claims that religious sentiments are of paramount consideration for the state and should not be interfered with. In a secular democratic framework, law and order, human rights, public order, and the constitutional rule of law take precedence over subjective sentiments or mob feelings. The state is duty-bound to maintain order and protect human lives above all else. Therefore, Reason (R) is also incorrect.


Thus, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are incorrect statement statements.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...