Question Details

The government has amended the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018. The Ministry of Finance on November 7, 2022, issued a notification for amending the scheme to provide “an additional period of 15 days” for their sale “in the year of general elections to the Legislative Assembly of any States or Union Territories with Legislature”. The bonds under this scheme are usually made available for purchase by any person for a period of ten days each in the months of January, April, July, and October, when specified by the Union Government. The original scheme had provided for an additional period of thirty days, as specified by the Government, in the year when Lok Sabha elections are held, while the amendment adds another 15 days.

Since Assembly elections to various States and Union Territories are held every year, the amendment effectively means that there will be 15 additional dates annually during which the bonds can be sold. Immediately after issuing the notification, the Union Government also announced the sale of electoral bonds under the 23rd tranche from the 9th to 15th of November 2022.

The notification said the sale of bonds would take place through the 29 authorised branches of the State Bank of India. The notification said the sale of bonds would take place through the 29 authorised branches of the said bank from November 9 to November 15, 2022. Like in previous rounds of sale, the electoral bonds shall be valid for 15 calendar days from the date of issue and no payment shall be made to any payee political party if the bond is deposited after expiry of the validity period. The Electoral Bond deposited by an eligible political party in its account shall be credited on the same day.

[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Electoral Bonds Scheme Amended To Allow Sale for Additional 15 Days in Assembly Election Years”, by Gaurav Vivek Bhatnagar,The Wire]


On November 10, 2022, Palak purchases an electoral bond from a branch of the State Bank of India, and hands it over to a representative of the PPP. The next day, the PPP announces that it has changed its candidates for the upcoming elections in Palak’s State. Upset at this news, she tells a PPP representative that she would like her bond back. The representative tells her that the bond has already been deposited, and that the money has been credited to the party’s account. Palak claims that since the period of validity of the bonds has not expired, she has the right to get her bond back from the party. Is she right?

Options

A

No, since Palak cannot ask for the bond back once she has given it to a political party.

B

No, since the party had already deposited the bond, and the money had been credited to its account.

C

Yes, since Palak bought the bond with her own money, and has the right to ask for it back.

D

Yes, since the PPP changed its candidates, and Palak may no longer support the party.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

No, since the party had already deposited the bond, and the money had been credited to its account.

Solution :

Correct Answer: No, since the party had already deposited the bond, and the money had been credited to its account.


Step-by-Step Explanation:

1. Analyze the Passage Rules:

According to the provided passage regarding the Electoral Bond Scheme:

- "The electoral bonds shall be valid for 15 calendar days from the date of issue..."

- "The Electoral Bond deposited by an eligible political party in its account shall be credited on the same day."


2. Evaluate the Situation:

Palak purchased the electoral bond on November 10, 2022, and voluntarily handed it over to a representative of the PPP (a political party). Once the political party received the bond, it deposited the bond into its account. In accordance with the scheme's rules, the money was credited to the party's account on the same day.


3. Legal/Logical Conclusion:

The validity period of 15 days is meant for the eligible political party to deposit the bond for encashment before it expires. It does not grant a donor the right to revoke or demand back a bond that has already been validly handed over, deposited, and fully credited to the political party's bank account. Therefore, Palak has no right to demand the return of the bond or the funds.


Hence, the correct conclusion is: No, since the party had already deposited the bond, and the money had been credited to its account.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...