Question Details

The graph below depicts the earnings of A and B over the period 2000 to 2010:


From the graph, which one of the following can be concluded?

Options

A

On the average A earned more than B during this period.

B

On the average B earned more than A during this period.

C

The earnings of A and B were equal during this period.

D

The earnings of A were less as compared to B during this period.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option A

On the average A earned more than B during this period.

Solution :

Correct Answer/Option: "On the average A earned more than B during this period."

To determine who earned more on the average between A and B during the period 2000 to 2010, we can analyze the visual data represented by the curves in the graph:

1. Understanding Average Earning:
The average earning over a given period is defined as the total earnings divided by the total duration of the period:

Average Earning=Total EarningsTotal Duration (10 years)
Graphically, the total earnings correspond to the area under the earning curve for each individual. Therefore, the individual with the larger area under their curve over the entire period [2000, 2010] has the higher average earning.

2. Analyzing the Graph by Intervals:
The curves intersect at the year 2007. We can divide the graph into two distinct intervals based on this intersection:

* First Interval (2000 to 2007): This period spans 7 years. During this time, the curve representing A is consistently higher than the curve representing B. This shows that A's earnings were significantly higher than B's earnings for the majority of the decade.
* Second Interval (2007 to 2010): This period spans only 3 years. During this time, the curve representing B is higher than the curve representing A, meaning B earned more than A in these final years.

3. Comparing the Total Earnings (Area Under the Curves):
* The period during which A earned more than B (7 years) is more than double the period during which B earned more than A (3 years).
* Visually, the vertical gap between curve A and curve B during the first 7 years is quite large, resulting in a much larger area accumulated by A compared to B.
* The smaller lead that B has over A in the final 3 years is not enough to offset the massive lead A accumulated over the first 7 years.
* As a result, the total area under curve A over the entire period from 2000 to 2010 is clearly larger than the total area under curve B.

Since A has a larger total earning over the same 10-year period, A's average earning must be greater than B's. Thus, we can conclude that on the average A earned more than B during this period.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CTET
  • intermediate
  • No time limit
  • child development and pedagogy, mathematics, social science

  • SSC
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours and 30 mins
  • child development and pedagogy, mathematics, social science

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...