Question Details

There are only three female students - Amala, Koli and Rini - and only three male students - Biman, Mathew and Shyamal - in a course. The course has two evaluation components, a project and a test. The aggregate score in the course is a weighted average of the two components, with the weights being positive and adding to 1 .

The projects are done in groups of two, with each group consisting of a female and a male student. Both the group members obtain the same score in the project.

The following additional facts are known about the scores in the project and the test.

1. The minimum, maximum and the average of both project and test scores were identical – 40, 80 and 60 , respectively.

2. The test scores of the students were all multiples of 10 ; four of them were distinct and the remaining two were equal to the average test scores.

3. Amala's score in the project was double that of Koli in the same, but Koli scored 20 more than Amala in the test. Yet Amala had the highest aggregate score.

4. Shyamal scored the second highest in the test. He scored two more than Koli, but two less than Amala in the aggregate.

5. Biman scored the second lowest in the test and the lowest in the aggregate.

6. Mathew scored more than Rini in the project, but less than her in the test.

Which of the following pairs of students were part of the same project team?

i) Amala and Biman

ii) Koli and Mathew

Options

A

Only i)

B

Only ii)

C

Both i) and ii)

D

Neither i) nor ii)

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option D

Neither i) nor ii)

Solution :

To determine which students were paired together, let us analyze the given information step-by-step.

Step 1: Determine the project and test scores
1. From Fact 1, the minimum, maximum, and average of both project and test scores are 40, 80, and 60, respectively.
2. There are 3 pairs of students, with each pair consisting of one female and one male student. Since both members of a group obtain the same project score, let the three group project scores be P1, P2, and P3. The sum of all project scores is:

2(P_1 + P_2 + P_3) = 6 \times 60 = 360 \implies P_1 + P_2 + P_3 = 180

Given that the minimum is 40 and the maximum is 80, we must have:

P_1 = 40, P_2 = 60, P_3 = 80

Thus, the project scores of the three teams are exactly 40, 60, and 80.
3. From Fact 2, the test scores are all multiples of 10. Four of them are distinct, and two are equal to the average test score (60). The sum of all test scores is:

6 \times 60 = 360

Since two scores are 60, and the rest are distinct multiples of 10 between 40 and 80, the set of test scores must be:

\{40, 50, 60, 60, 70, 80\}

Step 2: Assign project scores to the female students
From Fact 3, Amala's project score is double that of Koli. Since the project scores are 40, 60, and 80, we have:

P(\text{Koli}) = 40

P(\text{Amala}) = 80

This leaves Rini with the remaining project score:

P(\text{Rini}) = 60

Step 3: Analyze the aggregate scores and weights
Let wp be the weight of the project and wt be the weight of the test, where wp + wt = 1.
From Fact 3, Koli scored 20 more than Amala in the test:

T(\text{Koli}) = T(\text{Amala}) + 20

From Fact 4, Shyamal scored the second highest in the test. The second highest test score in the set {40,50,60,60,70,80} is 70. Thus:

T(\text{Shyamal}) = 70

Additionally, Shyamal's aggregate score was 2 more than Koli's, and 2 less than Amala's:

A(\text{Amala}) = A(\text{Shyamal}) + 2

A(\text{Shyamal}) = A(\text{Koli}) + 2

Therefore:

A(\text{Amala}) = A(\text{Koli}) + 4

We substitute the aggregate formula A=wpP+wtT:

w_p P(\text{Amala}) + w_t T(\text{Amala}) = w_p P(\text{Koli}) + w_t T(\text{Koli}) + 4

Substitute the known values: P(Amala)=80, P(Koli)=40, and T(Koli)=T(Amala)+20:

80 w_p + T(\text{Amala}) w_t = 40 w_p + (T(\text{Amala}) + 20) w_t + 4

40 w_p = 20 w_t + 4

Since wt=1-wp:

40 w_p = 20 (1 - w_p) + 4 \implies 60 w_p = 24 \implies w_p = 0.4 \text{ and } w_t = 0.6

Step 4: Find the test and project scores of the remaining students
Using wp=0.4 and wt=0.6:

A(\text{Amala}) = 0.4(80) + 0.6 T(\text{Amala}) = 32 + 0.6 T(\text{Amala})

A(\text{Koli}) = 0.4(40) + 0.6 T(\text{Koli}) = 16 + 0.6 (T(\text{Amala}) + 20) = 28 + 0.6 T(\text{Amala})

A(\text{Shyamal}) = A(\text{Koli}) + 2 = 30 + 0.6 T(\text{Amala})

Using Shyamal's test score of 70:

A(\text{Shyamal}) = 0.4 P(\text{Shyamal}) + 0.6 (70) = 0.4 P(\text{Shyamal}) + 42

Equating both expressions for Shyamal's aggregate:

0.4 P(\text{Shyamal}) + 42 = 30 + 0.6 T(\text{Amala}) \implies P(\text{Shyamal}) = 1.5 T(\text{Amala}) - 30

Since P(Shyamal) must be one of the project scores (40, 60, or 80), and T(Amala) is one of the test scores, we test the values:
- If T(Amala)=60, then P(Shyamal)=1.5(60)-30=60, which is valid.
Thus:

T(\text{Amala}) = 60, \quad T(\text{Koli}) = 80, \quad P(\text{Shyamal}) = 60

Step 5: Identify the project teams
- Since P(Shyamal)=60 and Rini is the female student with a project score of 60 (P(Rini)=60), Rini and Shyamal must be on the same project team.
- From Fact 6, Mathew scored more than Rini in the project:

P(\text{Mathew}) > P(\text{Rini}) = 60 \implies P(\text{Mathew}) = 80

Since Amala is the female student with a project score of 80 (P(Amala)=80), Amala and Mathew must be on the same project team.
- By elimination, the third team must be Koli and Biman (project score of 40).

Conclusion:
- Pair i) Amala and Biman: Incorrect (Amala is paired with Mathew, Biman is paired with Koli).
- Pair ii) Koli and Mathew: Incorrect (Koli is paired with Biman, Mathew is paired with Amala).
Therefore, the correct option is Neither i) nor ii).

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...