Question Details

There are two principal theories on the relationship between international law and domestic law- Monism and Dualism. The monistic theory maintains that the subjects of two systems of law, i.e., international law and municipal law are essentially one. The monistic theory asserts that international law and municipal law are fundamentally the same in nature, and arise from the same science of law, and are manifestations of a single conception of law. The followers of this theory view international law and municipal law as part of a universal body of legal rules binding all human beings, collectively or singly. In a monist system, international law does not need to be incorporated into domestic law because international law immediately becomes incorporated in domestic legal system upon ratification of an international treaty. According to this theory, domestic law is subordinate to international law. The Statute of the International Criminal Court, therefore, can be directly applied and adjudicated in national courts according to the monistic theory. According to dualism theory, international law and municipal law represent two entirely distinct legal systems, i.e., international has an intrinsically different character from that of municipal law. International law is not directly applicable in the domestic system under dualism. First, international law must be translated into State legislation before the domestic courts can apply it. For example, under dualism, ratification of the Statute of the International Criminal Court is not enough-it must be implemented through State legislation into the domestic system. Most states and courts presumptively view national and international legal systems as discrete entities and routinely discuss in dualist fashion incorporation of rules from one system to the other.


'X' is a developing country. 'X' ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1995, and incorporated the provisions of the said convention in its domestic legislation addressing climate change in 1996. However, ‘X’ has been widely criticized in the international community for its failure in meeting the obligations under the said convention. 'Y' is a developed country. 'Y' ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1995, and has not incorporated the provisions of the said convention in its domestic legislation till date. ‘Y’ has been appreciated by the international community for its success in meeting the obligations under the said convention. in the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

Options

A

‘X’ is a monist State and ‘Y’ is a dualist State.

B

‘X’ is a dualist State and ‘Y’ is a monist State.

C

‘X’ and ‘Y’ are both monist States.

D

‘X’ and ‘Y’ are both dualist States.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

‘X’ is a dualist State and ‘Y’ is a monist State.

Solution :

The correct answer is: ‘X’ is a dualist State and ‘Y’ is a monist State.


Step-by-step Explanation:


1. Understanding the Theories:
- Monism: Under the monistic theory, international law and domestic (municipal) law are part of a single legal system. International treaties automatically become part of domestic law upon ratification without needing separate national legislation.
- Dualism: Under the dualist theory, international law and domestic law are two distinct legal systems. International law is not directly applicable domestically upon ratification; it must first be transformed or incorporated into domestic law through specific State legislation.


2. Analyzing Country ‘X’:
Country ‘X’ ratified the convention in 1995 and specifically incorporated its provisions into domestic legislation in 1996. Because ‘X’ required domestic legislative incorporation to implement the international treaty, it follows the dualist approach.


3. Analyzing Country ‘Y’:
Country ‘Y’ ratified the convention in 1995 and has not incorporated the provisions into domestic legislation, yet it directly fulfills its obligations under the legal system. Because international treaty obligations apply directly without national legislation, ‘Y’ follows the monist approach.


Conclusion:
Therefore, country ‘X’ is a dualist State and country ‘Y’ is a monist State.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...