Question Details

Two recent developments have brought India’s reliance on fossil fuel into sharp focus. The Russia-Ukraine conflict and the consequent surge in crude oil prices roiled the economy. Separately, the most recent IPCC report on climate highlighted the energy sector’s large contribution to global warming. Both these developments need to be located in the context of India’s pledge to get to net zero carbon emissions by 2070. Meeting this pledge requires an overhaul of both the logistics and electricity sectors to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Transitioning to renewables in energy is an important part of the solution. Within renewables, solar energy has been lavished with policy support. However, it won’t be enough to meet the targets. Anil Kakodkar, former chairman of Atomic Energy Commission, had written that India can’t meet its net-zero commitment without nuclear power. He’s right. It is an area where India was off to an early start, developed relatively high indigenous capabilities in relation to other sectors, but subsequently let the ball drop. Today, nuclear power contributes a mere 3% of the total electricity generated, and has a capacity of 6780 MW. After the early euphoria of the India-United States civil nuclear deal, progress has been disappointing. The deal did open the pathway to a stable supply of uranium ore from Kazakhstan and Canada. However, the design of the subsequent bill on civil liability for nuclear damage killed the prospect of participation of Western firms. India’s main partner today is Russia, which side stepped the bill through inter-governmental agreements.


According to the author, Western firms lost the opportunity of doing business in the nuclear production in India because:

Options

A

they had to pay hefty penalties for delay in supply

B

they do not find nuclear power profitable

C

they do not agree with india’s place of nuclear plants

D

they failed to circumvent internal laws by other bilateral instruments

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option D

they failed to circumvent internal laws by other bilateral instruments

Solution :

The correct answer is: they failed to circumvent internal laws by other bilateral instruments


Explanation:

Based on the provided passage, the author highlights why Western firms lost out on participating in India's nuclear energy sector:

1. The passage states that "the design of the subsequent bill on civil liability for nuclear damage killed the prospect of participation of Western firms."

2. It further explains that "India’s main partner today is Russia, which side stepped the bill through inter-governmental agreements."

3. This directly implies that unlike Russia (which bypassed/side-stepped the liability bill using inter-governmental or bilateral agreements), Western firms failed to use similar bilateral instruments or mechanisms to circumvent the internal legal hurdles. Hence, they lost the opportunity to participate in India's nuclear production market.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...