Where a spouse contracts a second marriage while the first marriage is still subsisting, the spouse would be guilty of the offence of bigamy under the penal law in India, if it is proved that the first as well as the second marriages were legally valid, i.e., all the necessary ceremonies required by law or by custom have been performed at the time of contracting the marriages. According to the penal law in India, if a person, who has a living husband or wife, marries again, then such person is liable to be punished with imprisonment up to seven years along with a fine for committing the offence of bigamy. Although the penal law of India is applicable to all citizens irrespective of their religious affiliations, an exception to the offence of bigamy may be created by the law relating to marriage applicable to followers of a particular religion. Under the Hindu law relating to marriage, bigamy is not permitted. If a Hindu wife files a criminal complaint against her husband on the ground that during the subsistence of her marriage, her husband had married a second wife by converting into another religion which legally permits having more than one wife, then her husband is liable to be punished for the offence of bigamy. Further, the Hindu law relating to marriage also provides that the punishment for offence of bigamy as provided in the penal law of India would be applicable to marriage between two Hindus.
Mr. A, a Hindu male, has been married to ms. b, a Hindu female. their marriage was not solemnized as per Hindu rites and ceremonies or any other custom, but was performed by seeking blessings of their family members. After his marriage to ms. b, mr. A underwent religious conversion into a religion ‘X’ which legally permits males to have two wives. thereafter, mr. A got married to ms. C, a female belonging to religion ‘X’, in compliance with all the legal requirements of contracting a valid marriage under religion ‘X’. ms. b filed a criminal complaint against mr. A for committing the offence of bigamy. in the given situation, which of the following statements is true?
Correct Answer :
mr. A has not committed the offence of bigamy because his first marriage is not valid.
Solution :
The correct answer is: mr. A has not committed the offence of bigamy because his first marriage is not valid.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Understanding the Legal Definition of Bigamy:
According to the principles of penal law in India set out in the passage, for the offence of bigamy to be established, it must be proved that both the first marriage and the second marriage were legally valid. A valid marriage requires that all necessary ceremonies required by law or by custom have been duly performed at the time of contracting the marriage.
2. Analyzing the First Marriage (Mr. A and Ms. B):
The facts state that the marriage between Mr. A and Ms. B (both Hindus) was not solemnized according to Hindu rites, ceremonies, or any custom. Instead, it was performed merely by seeking the blessings of their family members.
Since essential legal/customary ceremonies were not performed, the first marriage is not legally valid in the eyes of the law.
3. Application of the Rule:
Because the first marriage lacks legal validity, one of the essential preconditions for bigamy—that the first marriage must be legally valid and subsisting—is not satisfied. Therefore, Mr. A cannot be held guilty of the offence of bigamy despite contracting a second marriage.
Conclusion:
Mr. A has not committed the offence of bigamy because his first marriage was legally invalid due to the absence of required rites and ceremonies.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.
