Which of the following is NOT true regarding the Monitor Hypothesis given by Stephen Krashen ?

The correct answer is: What is ‘acquired’ helps in monitoring what is ‘learnt’.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

1. Understanding Stephen Krashen's Monitor Hypothesis:
Stephen Krashen proposed the Monitor Hypothesis as part of his theory of second language acquisition. According to this hypothesis, language acquisition and language learning play distinct roles. Acquisition acts as the primary initiator of utterances in a second language, producing spontaneous and fluent speech.

2. Role of the Monitor:
In Krashen's theory, conscious learning acts as a "Monitor" or "Editor". The Monitor plans, edits, and corrects the language output generated by the acquired system. Therefore, what is learnt monitors what is acquired, not the other way around.

3. Evaluating the Options:
- "What is ‘acquired’ helps in monitoring what is ‘learnt’." — NOT TRUE. This statement reverses the relationship. The acquired system generates utterances, while the learnt system acts as the monitor.
- "The learner can only monitor if s/he has enough time and enough knowledge of the rules." — TRUE. Krashen states that monitoring requires three conditions: sufficient time, focus on form, and knowledge of the rules.
- "It is used in the context of second language acquisition." — TRUE. Krashen's Monitor Theory directly addresses second language acquisition (SLA).
- "It is based on the relationship between acquisition and learning." — TRUE. The core concept of the hypothesis defines how explicit learning interacts with implicit acquisition.

Hence, the statement claiming that what is acquired monitors what is learnt is incorrect regarding Krashen's Monitor Hypothesis, making it the right option to choose.