Which statement about predicate P(x) over natural numbers is TRUE?
Correct Answer :
( P(0) ∧ (∀x [ P(x+1) ]) ) ⇒ (∀x P(x))
Solution :
The correct option is:
( P(0) ∧ (∀x [ P(x+1) ]) ) ⇒ (∀x P(x))
Let's analyze why this statement is logically true for any predicate defined over the set of natural numbers (which typically starts at 0, i.e., ).
1. Understanding the Premise (Antecedent):
The premise of the implication is:
This premise is a conjunction of two distinct parts:
• : The predicate holds true for .
• : The predicate holds true for the successor of every natural number .
2. Evaluating the Second Conjunct:
Let's look closely at the statement .
Since ranges over all natural numbers :
• For , this asserts is true.
• For , this asserts is true.
• For , this asserts is true, and so on.
In general, this conjunct guarantees that is true for every positive integer .
3. Combining the Parts:
By combining the first conjunct (which covers ) and the second conjunct (which covers all ), we establish that is true for every single element in the domain of natural numbers.
Therefore, the conclusion must be true.
4. Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
• Option 2:
The implication runs backward (from to ). Knowing is true does not allow us to propagate the truth upward to larger natural numbers.
• Option 3:
This allows us to prove that holds for values less than or equal to 1000, but it does not tell us anything about any .
• Option 4:
This allows us to prove that holds for all , but it does not guarantee that the predicate holds for any elements smaller than 1000 (e.g., to ).
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.