Question Details

XVII. Surrogacy is defined by law as “a practice whereby one woman bears and gives birth to a child for an intending couple” and intends to hand over the child to them after the birth, as per the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (the “SRA”). The SRA restricts altruistic surrogacy to legally wedded infertile Indian couples. The couple is deemed eligible for surrogacy only if they have been married for five years. The SRA sets an age limitation for the couple. A husband must be between 26 and 55 years of age and a wife between 23 and 50 years. Further, Indian couples with biological or adopted children are prohibited from undertaking surrogacy, save for some exceptions such as mentally or physically challenged children, or those suffering from a life-threatening disorder or fatal illness. The SRA provides that the surrogate mother has to be a close relative of the couple (such as a sibling of one of the members of the couple), a married woman with a child of her own, aged between 25 and 35 years, who has been a surrogate only once in her life. Even within this category of people, commercial surrogacy is banned in India and that includes the “commercialisation of surrogacy services or procedures or its component services or component procedures”. The surrogate woman cannot be given payments, rewards, benefits or fees, “except the medical expenses and such other prescribed expenses incurred on the surrogate mother and the insurance coverage for the surrogate mother”.


A legal commentator points out some criticisms of the law. “Permitting limited conditional surrogacy to married Indian couples and disqualifying other persons on basis of nationality, marital status, sexual orientation or age does not pass the test of equality,” he writes. He adds that reproductive autonomy, inclusive of the right to procreation and parenthood is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The intending parents typically sign a contract with the surrogate. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (the “ICA”) provides that a valid contract has to be in writing, and signed in the presence of two witnesses. The ICA also provides that a contract that is prohibited by any other law will not be valid under the ICA.


Assume Rani and Shiva are eligible for surrogacy under the SRA. They approach Geeta to act as a surrogate. Geeta is Rani’s sister. She is 29 years old. She is married, has one child, and has been a surrogate twice before. Which of the following statements are false?
i. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is a close relative.
ii. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is married.
iii. Geeta has been a surrogate only twice before and is now eligible to be a surrogate for Rani.
iv. Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is 29.

Options

A

Statement iii

B

Statements ii and iii

C

Statements ii, iii, and iv

D

Statements i, iii, and iv

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

Statements ii and iii

Solution :

The correct answer is Statements ii and iii.


Step-by-step Explanation:


Let's analyze the eligibility of Geeta to be a surrogate mother according to the criteria set by the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (SRA) as described in the passage:


Criteria specified in the passage for a surrogate mother:

1. Must be a close relative of the couple (such as a sibling of one of the members of the couple).

2. Must be a married woman with a child of her own.

3. Must be aged between 25 and 35 years.

4. Must have been a surrogate only once in her life.


Analyzing Geeta's conditions and each statement:

- Geeta is Rani's sister (a close relative) → Satisfied.

- Geeta is 29 years old (between 25 and 35) → Satisfied.

- Geeta is married and has one child → Satisfied.

- Geeta has been a surrogate twice beforeFailed! The law strictly mandates that the surrogate must have been a surrogate only once in her life. Since she has already been a surrogate twice before, she is overall ineligible to act as a surrogate mother.


Now let's evaluate which statements are false:


1. Statement i: "Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is a close relative."

Being a close relative is one of the necessary conditions for eligibility, but since she violates the previous surrogacy count rule, stating that she is eligible overall due to being a relative is a conditional statement. However, let's look at statements ii and iii which are directly incorrect assertions about eligibility logic.


2. Statement ii: "Geeta is eligible to be a surrogate because she is married."

While being married is a necessary condition, it is not sufficient on its own to make her eligible, especially when she has violated the surrogacy limit (has been a surrogate twice before). Therefore, declaring her eligible based on this when she is disqualified overall makes the statement false.


3. Statement iii: "Geeta has been a surrogate only twice before and is now eligible to be a surrogate for Rani."

This statement is strictly false. The law states a woman must have been a surrogate only once in her life. Having been a surrogate twice before makes her completely ineligible, not eligible.


Therefore, statements ii and iii are false.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...