Question Details

XXII. In this moment, the developed countries — I point to them, because these countries have already burnt massive amounts of carbon dioxide for energy to build their economies — are faced with a real energy conundrum. On the one hand, developed countries are battered because of a fast-heating planet; temperatures have gone through the roof; droughts and extreme weather events are hitting them as well. On the other hand, ordinary people in these countries are worried, not just because of climate change but because of the lack of energy to heat their homes this coming winter. In the US, gas prices went up in summer, so much so that people travelled less and consumption of fuel dropped. But now prices are down and it is business as usual.
The fact is that this energy disruption has provided the much-needed vault to the beleaguered fossil fuel industry. Governments are asking this industry to supply more. Europe has baptised natural gas, a fossil fuel less polluting than coal but still a major emitter of carbon dioxide, as “clean”. The US has passed a climate bill, which will invest in renewable energy but conditional to increased spends on oil and gas and the opening up of millions of hectares of federal land for drilling. Through this bill the US will do more than ever before to build a manufacturing base for renewable energy, particularly solar. Europe, even in this desperate scramble for gas, is working to ramp up its investment in renewable power. So, it is the worst of times. It could be the best of times, but there are some caveats. One, this renewed interest in fossil fuels must remain temporary and transient. Given the nature of economies, once the investment has been made in this new infrastructure or the supply of fossil fuel has increased from new oil and gas discoveries, it will be difficult to wean off. Two, these countries should not be entitled to more use of fossil fuels in our world of shrunk carbon budgets. They need to reduce emissions drastically and leave whatever little carbon budget space that is remaining to poorer countries to use, thereby satisfying such poorer countries’ demands. [Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “New energy conundrum”, by Sunita Narain, DownToEarth]


Which of the following is most similar to the author’s statements about developed countries’ renewed interest in fossil fuels?

Options

A

Developed countries should not, under any circumstances, invest any resources in fossil fuel energy extraction, and must immediately put a halt to all fossil fuel consumption.

B

Things could improve if developed countries recognise the difficulty of moving away from reliance on such sources of energy and make a conscious effort to move to alternate or renewable energy sources quickly.

C

Since investments in energy extraction of any kind are very expensive, developed countries must ensure that their needs are met before continuing investments in fossil fuels.

D

Developing countries must not, under any circumstances, be allowed to make claims on whatever carbon budget space remains.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option B

Things could improve if developed countries recognise the difficulty of moving away from reliance on such sources of energy and make a conscious effort to move to alternate or renewable energy sources quickly.

Solution :

Correct Answer: Things could improve if developed countries recognise the difficulty of moving away from reliance on such sources of energy and make a conscious effort to move to alternate or renewable energy sources quickly.


Explanation:

To determine the option that is most similar to the author's statements regarding developed countries' renewed interest in fossil fuels, let us analyze the passage's key arguments:


1. The Conundrum and Temporary Shift: The author notes that while developed countries face extreme climate events, they are currently turning back to fossil fuels due to immediate energy demands. However, the author explicitly highlights two caveats:
- Caveat One: This renewed interest in fossil fuels must remain strictly temporary and transient because once investments are made in new fossil fuel infrastructure, "it will be difficult to wean off."
- Caveat Two: Developed countries must drastically cut emissions to leave the remaining carbon budget for poorer/developing nations.


2. Evaluating the Options:

- Option 1: Suggests an immediate absolute halt under any circumstances. This contradicts the passage, which acknowledges the current reality and desperation while emphasizing that the shift must be temporary and managed.
- Option 2: Accurately reflects the author's warning about the difficulty of weaning off fossil fuels once invested in, and aligns with the author's emphasis on making a swift, conscious transition toward renewable energy sources.
- Option 3: Claims developed countries must prioritize their own needs before ending fossil fuel investments, which directly contradicts the author's call for developed countries to reduce emissions drastically and leave carbon space for poorer nations.
- Option 4: Argues developing countries must not make claims on the remaining carbon budget, which is the exact opposite of what the passage advocates in Caveat Two.


Therefore, Option 2 is the statement that best captures the essence and nuance of the author's views.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...