Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the question that follows.
Nearly four decades ago, a coalition of rural villagers in a secluded region of the Andes halted a corporate logging operation slated to clear a nearby forest. This confrontation sparked the regional conservation movement, symbolizing a broader wave of ecological conflicts throughout the late 20th century. These disputes spanned disputes over woodlands, marine fisheries, and communal grazing lands, as well as protests against massive hydroelectric projects and unchecked mining operations. In each instance, the expansion of urban markets and industrial growth restricted rural populations from utilizing the natural resources vital for their daily sustenance.
While environmentalism in wealthier nations often centered on preserving wild areas and safeguarding endangered fauna, the movement in this developing region was driven by basic human survival. It emerged as an advocacy system of the marginalized, fusing demands for social equity with ecological sustainability. Proponents contended that the prevailing systems of resource exploitation disenfranchised local populations while degrading the natural habitats they depended on.
Decades ago, when state-controlled economic planning predominated, critics initially dismissed these local conservation efforts as foreign-backed interference. Over time, however, the persistence of these demonstrations compelled the administration to implement regulatory reforms. Environmental protection agencies were created, and new legislation was enacted to limit pollution and conserve primary forests. Yet, when economic liberalization policies were introduced in the 1990s, the reduction of state oversight led to even more aggressive exploitation of natural habitats by private enterprises, surpassing the ecological damage caused under the previous state-run system.
How did the chief purpose of environmental movements in prosperous nations differ from that of activists in the developing area described here?
Correct Answer :
In wealthier nations, campaigns commonly emphasized protecting natural landscapes and threatened species; in the developing area, they were inseparable from livelihoods and survival.
Solution :
Correct Answer: In wealthier nations, campaigns commonly emphasized protecting natural landscapes and threatened species; in the developing area, they were inseparable from livelihoods and survival.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Question
The question asks how the main focus or purpose of environmental movements in wealthy/prosperous nations differed from that of activists in the developing region described in the passage.
Step 2: Locate Relevant Information in the Passage
Looking at the second paragraph of the text:
1. Environmentalism in wealthier nations "often centered on preserving wild areas and safeguarding endangered fauna."
2. In contrast, the movement in the developing region "was driven by basic human survival" and served as an "advocacy system of the marginalized, fusing demands for social equity with ecological sustainability."
Step 3: Evaluate the Logical Match
- Protecting wild areas and safeguarding fauna directly maps to "protecting natural landscapes and threatened species."
- Being driven by basic human survival directly maps to being "inseparable from livelihoods and survival."
Conclusion:
Hence, the correct option accurately reflects the distinction explicitly drawn by the passage.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.