Biodiversity is being lost at a rate not seen since the last mass extinction. But the United Nations decade-old plan to slow down and eventually stop the decline of species and ecosystems by 2020 has failed. Most of the plan’s 20 targets - known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets - have not been met. The Aichi targets are part of an international agreement called the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, and member states are now finalizing replacements for them. Currently referred to as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), its draft was published in July 2021. It aims to slow down the rate of biodiversity loss by 2030. And by 2050, biodiversity will be “valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people”. The GBF is a comprehensive plan. But success will require systemic change across public policy. That is both a strength and a weakness. If systemic change can be implemented, it will lead to real change. But if it cannot, there’s no plan B. This has led some researchers to argue that one target or number should be prioritized and defined in a way that is clear to the public and to policy makers. It would be biodiversity’s equivalent of the 2°C climate target.
As per the passage, which of the following is a challenge for implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity Framework (gbF)?
Correct Answer :
Clarity of action plan for the society and government
Solution :
The correct option is Clarity of action plan for the society and government.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Analyze the Question:
The question asks us to identify a challenge for the implementation of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) based strictly on the provided passage.
2. Evaluate the Textual Evidence:
The passage mentions:
"The GBF is a comprehensive plan. But success will require systemic change across public policy. That is both a strength and a weakness. If systemic change can be implemented, it will lead to real change. But if it cannot, there’s no plan B. This has led some researchers to argue that one target or number should be prioritized and defined in a way that is clear to the public and to policy makers."
3. Logical Deduction:
The text points out that requiring systemic change across policy makers and the public creates a key challenge, leading researchers to advocate for a single, clear target that is easily understood and actionable for both the public (society) and policy makers (government). Hence, ensuring clarity of the action plan for society and government is highlighted as a primary challenge for its implementation.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.