Biodiversity is being lost at a rate not seen since the last mass extinction. But the United Nations decade-old plan to slow down and eventually stop the decline of species and ecosystems by 2020 has failed. Most of the plan’s 20 targets - known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets - have not been met. The Aichi targets are part of an international agreement called the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, and member states are now finalizing replacements for them. Currently referred to as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), its draft was published in July 2021. It aims to slow down the rate of biodiversity loss by 2030. And by 2050, biodiversity will be “valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people”. The GBF is a comprehensive plan. But success will require systemic change across public policy. That is both a strength and a weakness. If systemic change can be implemented, it will lead to real change. But if it cannot, there’s no plan B. This has led some researchers to argue that one target or number should be prioritized and defined in a way that is clear to the public and to policy makers. It would be biodiversity’s equivalent of the 2°C climate target.
Which of the following can be inferred from the above passage?
Correct Answer :
the holistic nature of the post-2020 global biodiversity Framework (gbF) can be a boon or a bane.
Solution :
The correct answer is: the holistic nature of the post-2020 global biodiversity Framework (gbF) can be a boon or a bane.
Step-by-step Explanation:
1. Analyze the key details in the passage:
The passage mentions: "The GBF is a comprehensive plan. But success will require systemic change across public policy. That is both a strength and a weakness. If systemic change can be implemented, it will lead to real change. But if it cannot, there’s no plan B."
2. Evaluate the options based on the text:
• A "comprehensive plan" requiring "systemic change across public policy" refers to the holistic nature of the framework.
• The text explicitly states that requiring systemic change is "both a strength and a weakness."
• A strength acts as a advantage or a "boon," while a weakness acts as a drawback or a "bane."
• Therefore, depending on whether systemic change can be successfully implemented or not, this holistic/comprehensive nature can act as either a benefit (boon) or a detriment (bane).
3. Conclusion:
Hence, it can be logically inferred that the holistic nature of the post-2020 GBF can be a boon or a bane.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.