Question Details

For many individuals, the mere sight of a needle can create intense fear and anxiety. This fear, known as trypanophobia, has been a significant barrier for patients who need regular injections, especially those suffering from diabetes and dependent on daily insulin shots. Because of the pain and discomfort associated with traditional injections, some patients delay or even avoid taking essential medicines, putting their health at serious risk. To address this challenge, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have been exploring advanced technologies that can replace conventional injections with an easier, less frightening method: ingestible capsules that can deliver medicine internally.

The innovative idea behind these capsules is simple yet groundbreaking. Each capsule contains a miniature needle designed to inject the medicine directly into the stomach lining after being swallowed. This way, the medicine, such as insulin, can enter the bloodstream without the need for a traditional syringe. However, early trials revealed a crucial problem. For the injection to be effective, the tiny needle must penetrate the stomach wall at a precise angle. The stomach’s constant movement and the varying position of the capsule made it extremely difficult to maintain this level of accuracy. As a result, the first version of the capsule struggled to deliver consistent results.

To overcome this obstacle, scientists designed two new types of capsules inspired by unique natural and technological models. The first design was modeled after a space lander. This capsule was built to orient itself steadily once inside the stomach and then spray the medicine downward. To test its effectiveness, researchers used a green dye on pig tissues to simulate how the medicine would be delivered. The experiment showed encouraging results, as the medicine reached the targeted tissues efficiently. The second design took inspiration from squids, which can release ink forcefully using a special muscle. In this model, the capsule was cylindrical and capable of spraying the medicine sideways by using a similar muscular mechanism. This method also proved successful in laboratory tests.

Both experimental approaches demonstrated that delivering insulin or other injectable drugs through swallowable capsules is not only possible but also highly promising. Although further research and clinical trials are necessary before this technology becomes widely available, these results bring hope to diabetic patients who fear needles. By removing the pain and psychological discomfort of injections, MIT’s capsule technology could revolutionize diabetes care and eventually change the way many other injectable medicines are administered.

Which of the following best characterizes the research approach adopted by MIT scientists?

Options

A

Repetitive experimentation without interdisciplinary inspiration

B

Mechanistic trial-and-error with no practical outcomes

C

Nature- and technology-inspired problem-solving based on observed delivery issues

D

Reliance on pharmaceutical companies to build prototypes

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option C

Nature- and technology-inspired problem-solving based on observed delivery issues

Solution :

The correct answer is Nature- and technology-inspired problem-solving based on observed delivery issues.


Step-by-Step Explanation:


1. Understanding the Initial Problem:
The passage describes how MIT researchers aimed to solve the issue of trypanophobia (needle fear) by designing an ingestible capsule to deliver medication like insulin. However, initial trials revealed an observed delivery issue: the capsule could not consistently align itself to inject medicine into the stomach lining due to constant stomach movement.


2. Analyzing the Solutions Developed:
To overcome this obstacle, scientists created two new capsule designs:

  • First design: Inspired by a technological model, specifically a space lander, to orient itself steadily and spray medicine downward.
  • Second design: Inspired by a natural model, specifically squids, to forcefully spray medicine sideways using a mechanism similar to squid muscles.


3. Evaluating the Options:

  • Option 1: Repetitive experimentation without interdisciplinary inspiration – Incorrect, because the researchers drew inspiration from nature (squids) and technology (space landers).
  • Option 2: Mechanistic trial-and-error with no practical outcomes – Incorrect, because both designs demonstrated successful and promising laboratory outcomes.
  • Option 3: Nature- and technology-inspired problem-solving based on observed delivery issuesCorrect, as it accurately characterizes how the scientists observed the delivery/positioning problem in early trials and solved it using designs inspired by nature (squids) and technology (space landers).
  • Option 4: Reliance on pharmaceutical companies to build prototypes – Incorrect, as the passage does not mention relying on pharmaceutical companies for prototypes.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...