Mindyard | In a world where aspirations for upward mobility are fervent, the opportunities for achieving such dreams remain limited. When one generation falls short, the mantle of ambition passes to the next, embedding within it a heavy burden of responsibility. Failing to meet these expectations can lead to profound sorrow, and in the direst cases, even to suicide. It’s in this landscape that coaching institutes assume a significant role, cultivating an atmosphere of uncertainty among students and parents. A stark discrepancy emerges between preparation for board examinations and competitive tests, amplifying the inequalities that plague the education system. The coaching industry’s massive marketing campaigns further exacerbate the situation, with some strategies veering into ethical grey areas. The tests themselves, designed to be more challenging than standardised exams, set the stage for feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt when not conquered. Our educational system is tailored to gauge an individual’s merit through examinations. Eminent thinker Michael J Sandel dubs this system the “tyranny of merit”, a sentiment echoed by the Supreme Court of India. Upholding the OBC reservation judgment, the Court called for a deeper evaluation of the “idea of merit”, highlighting its nuanced nature. Merit as a concept remains shrouded in misunderstanding and often goes unexamined within school curriculum. Adapting to new living arrangements, sourcing nourishing meals, battling isolation, and grappling with commutes form the backdrop against, which education unfolds. For marginalised communities and gender minorities, these hurdles are often amplified. Social media algorithms exacerbate mental health concerns, sowing loneliness and impeding attention spans and creativity. Technology emerges as a potential equaliser in this landscape. Online platforms now offer preparation opportunities from the comfort of one’s home. Government-curated or market-driven content could usher in a new era of accessibility. [Extracted, with edits and revisions from “Kota suicides: Coaching institutes manufacture insecurity — moving beyond the tyranny of merit might help” authored by Akash Kumar and published in The Indian Express dated September 2, 2023] As per the author, which one of the following is not likely leading to suicide among the students? Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes., Burdening of ambitions by one generation to another., Creation of hostile environment by the coaching institutes., Living in a surrounding with different background and culture.

In a world where aspirations for upward mobility are fervent, the opportunities for achieving such dreams remain limited. When one generation falls short, the mantle of ambition passes to the next, embedding within it a heavy burden of responsibility. Failing to meet these expectations can lead to profound sorrow, and in the direst cases, even to suicide. It’s in this landscape that coaching institutes assume a significant role, cultivating an atmosphere of uncertainty among students and parents. A stark discrepancy emerges between preparation for board examinations and competitive tests, amplifying the inequalities that plague the education system. The coaching industry’s massive marketing campaigns further exacerbate the situation, with some strategies veering into ethical grey areas. The tests themselves, designed to be more challenging than standardised exams, set the stage for feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt when not conquered. Our educational system is tailored to gauge an individual’s merit through examinations. Eminent thinker Michael J Sandel dubs this system the “tyranny of merit”, a sentiment echoed by the Supreme Court of India. Upholding the OBC reservation judgment, the Court called for a deeper evaluation of the “idea of merit”, highlighting its nuanced nature. Merit as a concept remains shrouded in misunderstanding and often goes unexamined within school curriculum. Adapting to new living arrangements, sourcing nourishing meals, battling isolation, and grappling with commutes form the backdrop against, which education unfolds. For marginalised communities and gender minorities, these hurdles are often amplified. Social media algorithms exacerbate mental health concerns, sowing loneliness and impeding attention spans and creativity. Technology emerges as a potential equaliser in this landscape. Online platforms now offer preparation opportunities from the comfort of one’s home. Government-curated or market-driven content could usher in a new era of accessibility. [Extracted, with edits and revisions from “Kota suicides: Coaching institutes manufacture insecurity — moving beyond the tyranny of merit might help” authored by Akash Kumar and published in The Indian Express dated September 2, 2023]

As per the author, which one of the following is not likely leading to suicide among the students?

Options

Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes.

Burdening of ambitions by one generation to another.

Creation of hostile environment by the coaching institutes.

Living in a surrounding with different background and culture.

Correct Answer :

Option A

Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes.

Solution :

The correct answer is Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes.

Step-by-step Explanation:

1. Analyze the Question:
The question asks to identify which option is not likely a cause leading to student suicides, based strictly on the provided passage.

2. Evaluate the Options against the Passage:

Option 1 ("Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes."):
The passage mentions: "The coaching industry’s massive marketing campaigns further exacerbate the situation, with some strategies veering into ethical grey areas." It describes marketing strategies as ethically grey or exacerbating, but it does NOT describe them as "incorrect marketing strategies". Therefore, "incorrect marketing strategies" is not mentioned as a direct factor leading to suicides.

Option 2 ("Burdening of ambitions by one generation to another."):
The passage explicitly states: "When one generation falls short, the mantle of ambition passes to the next, embedding within it a heavy burden of responsibility. Failing to meet these expectations can lead to profound sorrow, and in the direst cases, even to suicide." This directly links generational ambitions to suicide.

Option 3 ("Creation of hostile environment by the coaching institutes."):
The passage states: "...coaching institutes assume a significant role, cultivating an atmosphere of uncertainty among students and parents." This atmosphere of uncertainty and insecurity contributes directly to mental distress.

Option 4 ("Living in a surrounding with different background and culture."):
The passage references the struggles of "Adapting to new living arrangements, sourcing nourishing meals, battling isolation, and grappling with commutes..." which highlights the difficulties of adapting to a new, unfamiliar environment.

Conclusion:
"Incorrect marketing strategies by the coaching institutes" is not cited by the author as a cause leading to student suicides, making it the correct choice for the factor that is not likely leading to suicide.

Get 3 Months FREE trial

Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.

Unlock Our Free Library

You may also like

Study Material

Clat 2019 UG Question Paper with Solution

Clat 2018 UG Question Paper with Solution

Mock Tests

Clat 2019 UG

Clat 2018 UG

Ask AI Tutor