In the domain of education, the current pandemic has made three things clear. It has proved beyond any doubt that we need schools. Irrespective of which country one talks about, students and parents want schools to open and function in full glory, with appropriate precautions. Secondly, it has shown that technology may prove to be useful in education if it is employed thoughtfully. Random surfing of the Internet may lead to a collection of pieces of information that do not add up to any meaning. As Noam Chomsky says, “You cannot pursue any kind of inquiry without a relatively clear framework that is directing your search and helping you choose what is significant and what is not.” Moreover, there cannot be any hegemonic technomanagerial solutions to the linguistic and cultural heterogeneity of students; technology must help us to respect individual, peer group and community needs and aspirations. Thirdly, a convergence of the efforts of the public, civil society and private enterprise will have to take place if we wish technology to meaningfully mediate between school and home, particularly among underprivileged groups.
The concept, structure and functioning of a school/college should not be trivialised in any way. This institution has survived since ancient times in spite of proposals for “de -schooling” of various kinds. It is true that schools to a great extent perpetuate the status quo and, as Ivan Illich observed, encourage “consumerism” and “obedience to authority”; but it is also true that those who produced some of the most revolutionary moments in history, including quantum jumps in knowledge, also went to school. The kind of web of learners Illich imagines may in fact have its roots in schools. There are also people who trivialise schools for the kind of investments they demand in terms of space, buildings, teachers, libraries and labs and other infrastructure.
One thing you never forget is the school you went to, friends you made there and the kind of teachers who taught you; the kind of teachers you loved, the kind you mocked at with friends. You recollect nostalgically the sports and other co-curricular activities you took part in. Some of you may still have preserved your school blazer, trophies and photographs with a sense of joy. It is important to see school holistically; it is not a set of atomic items of rooms, library, assembly halls, canteen and playgrounds; it is all of these but in symbiotic relationship with each other, the contours of which are often far too obvious and often simply mysterious.
Which of the following is not the learning outcome from pandemic?
Correct Answer :
Technology is undoubtedly and absolutely useful in education.
Solution :
The correct answer is Technology is undoubtedly and absolutely useful in education.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Analyze the Question:
The question asks us to identify which option is NOT a learning outcome from the pandemic according to the provided passage.
2. Evaluate Option 1: "Parents and students from around the world need schools."
The passage states: "It has proved beyond any doubt that we need schools. Irrespective of which country one talks about, students and parents want schools to open..."
Therefore, this is a clear learning outcome mentioned in the text.
3. Evaluate Option 2: "Technology is undoubtedly and absolutely useful in education."
The passage explicitly states: "Secondly, it has shown that technology may prove to be useful in education if it is employed thoughtfully."
The passage makes technology's usefulness conditional upon thoughtful application rather than stating it is "undoubtedly and absolutely useful" in an unconditional manner.
Hence, this statement is an overgeneralization/distortion of what the passage states, making it NOT a correct learning outcome derived from the text.
4. Evaluate Option 3: "Technology may be used meaningfully to mediate between schools and home among underprivileged groups."
The passage states: "Thirdly, a convergence of the efforts of the public, civil society and private enterprise will have to take place if we wish technology to meaningfully mediate between school and home, particularly among underprivileged groups."
This directly reflects the text and is a valid learning outcome.
Conclusion:
Because Option 2 claims absolute and unconditional usefulness, which contradicts the passage's nuanced condition ("if it is employed thoughtfully"), it is not a learning outcome from the pandemic.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.