Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. I may here trace the history of the shaping of the Preamble because this would show that the Preamble was in conformity with the Constitution as it was finally accepted. Not only was the Constitution framed in the light of the Preamble but the Preamble was ultimately settled in the light of the Constitution. In the earliest draft the Preamble was something formal and read: ”We, the people of India, seeking to promote the common good, do hereby, through our chosen representatives, enact, adopt and give to ourselves this Constitution.
After the plan of June 3, 1947, which led to the decision to partition the country and to set up two independent Dominions of India and Pakistan, on June 8, 1947, a joint sub-committee of the Union Constitution and Provincial Constitution Committees, took note that the objective resolution would require amendment in view of the latest announcement of the British Government. The announcement of June 3 had made it clear that full independence, in the form of Dominion Status, would be conferred on India as from August 15, 1947. After examining the implications of partition the sub-committee thought that the question of making changes in the Objectives Resolution could appropriately be considered only when effect had actually been given to the June 3 Plan. Later on July 12, 1947, the special sub-committee again postponed consideration of the matter.
The Union Constitution Committee provisionally accepted the Preamble as drafted by B.N. Rao and reproduced it in its report of July 4, 1947 without any change, with the tacit recognition at that stage that the Preamble would be finally based on the Objectives Resolution. In a statement circulated to members of the Assembly on July 18, 1947 Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru inter alia, observed that the Preamble was covered more or less by the Objectives Resolution which it was intended to incorporate in the final Constitution, subject to some modification on account of the political changes resulting from partition. (327 words)
(Extracted with edits and revision from B Shiva Rao’s-Framing of India’s Constitution)
According to the passage, the relationship between the Constitution and the Preamble can best be described as:
Correct Answer :
Both the Constitution and the Preamble were shaped in light of each other
Solution :
The correct option is Both the Constitution and the Preamble were shaped in light of each other.
Step-by-step Explanation:
1. Analyze the Passage:
In the very first paragraph of the passage, the author explicitly describes the mutual relationship between the Preamble and the Constitution:
"Not only was the Constitution framed in the light of the Preamble but the Preamble was ultimately settled in the light of the Constitution."
2. Evaluate the Options:
- Option 1 ("The Preamble was drafted in isolation"): Incorrect, because the passage shows the drafting of the Preamble was linked closely with the Constitution and the Objectives Resolution.
- Option 2 ("The Constitution and the Preamble were framed independent of each other"): Incorrect, as the passage explicitly highlights their interdependence.
- Option 3 ("Both the Constitution and the Preamble were shaped in light of each other"): Correct, as it directly mirrors the statement in the text.
- Option 4 ("The Preamble had no relevance to the Constitution"): Incorrect, since the Preamble was intended to be incorporated into the final Constitution.
Therefore, the passage best describes the relationship as both being shaped in the light of each other.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.