Read the passage and answer the question based on it.
Scientists have long recognised the incredible diversity within a species. But they thought it reflected evolutionary changes that unfolded imperceptibly, over millions of years. That divergence between populations within a species was enforced, according to Ernst Mayr, the great evolutionary biologist of the 1940s, when a population was separated from the rest of the species by a mountain range or a desert, preventing breeding across the divide over geologic scales of time. Without the separation, gene flow was relentless. But as the separation persisted, the isolated population grew apart and speciation occurred.
In the mid-1960s, the biologist Paul Ehrlich - author of The Population Bomb (1968) - and his Stanford University colleague Peter Raven challenged Mayr's ideas about speciation. They had studied checkerspot butterflies living in the Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve in California, and it soon became clear that they were not examining a single population. Through years of capturing, marking and then recapturing the butterflies, they were able to prove that within the population, spread over just 50 acres of suitable checkerspot habitat, there were three groups that rarely interacted despite their very close proximity.
Among other ideas, Ehrlich and Raven argued in a now classic paper from 1969 that gene flow was not as predictable and ubiquitous as Mayr and his cohort maintained, and thus evolutionary divergence between neighbouring groups in a population was probably common. They also asserted that isolation and gene flow were less important to evolutionary divergence than natural selection (when factors such as mate choice, weather, disease or predation cause better-adapted individuals to survive and pass on their successful genetic traits). For example, Ehrlich and Raven suggested that, without the force of natural selection, an isolated population would remain unchanged and that, in other scenarios, natural selection could be strong enough to overpower gene flow...
All of the following statements are true according to the passage EXCEPT
Correct Answer :
The Population Bomb questioned dominant ideas about species diversity
Solution :
Correct Option: B
Let's analyze each statement:
- Option A: According to the passage, Ehrlich and Raven asserted that gene flow (along with isolation) was less important to evolutionary divergence than natural selection, implying it is still a contributing factor. Mayr also argued that lack of separation allowed gene flow to prevent divergence, meaning its presence/absence directly influences the process.
- Option B: The passage states that Paul Ehrlich is the author of the book The Population Bomb (1968). However, it was their classic 1969 paper, not the book itself, which challenged/questioned the dominant ideas about species diversity (speciation). Thus, this statement is NOT true according to the text.
- Option C: The first paragraph mentions that scientists "thought it reflected evolutionary changes that unfolded imperceptibly, over millions of years." This makes it a true statement in the context of scientific beliefs described in the passage.
- Option D: The second paragraph discusses checkerspot butterflies living in close proximity (just 50 acres) that formed three separate groups that rarely interacted, serving as the basis for challenging Mayr's ideas on speciation.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.