Some readers wondered whether my reading of the crisis in the news media is about journalism or about the news industry. Though the fortunes of the news industry have a bearing on journalism, there is, indeed, a difference between looking at issues that govern journalism and the factors that contribute to the financial stress of the media industry. Over the last few years, I have been discussing the impact of digitalisation on journalism. The pandemic has accelerated the process of digital transformation of the news media. Therefore, these issues need close scrutiny. One of the defining elements of analog journalism was the way two crucial functions of journalism — bearing witness and making sense — complemented each other and helped people make informed choices. When I talk about the strength of analog, I am neither romanticising the past nor am I a Luddite. Most importantly, I do not believe in nostalgia. Many scholars have established ―how rose-coloured glasses always leads to an unfair distortion — looking back on the best of the past while comparing it to the worst of the present.‖ Hence, when I talk about the digital information news environment, I am talking about how there needs to be a conducive atmosphere for credible information to resonate with the people. Literature on misinformation, disinformation and malinformation reveals a new distinction in the minds of the citizens. Editors and journalists have to contend with a new breed of sceptics. These are the people who trust social media forwards more than evidence-based, data-driven journalism. Their confirmation bias flows from encrypted social media platforms that are full of conspiracy theories.
[Excerpt from an Article by A.S. Panneerselvan, The Hindu, dated August 10, 2020]
In this line, ―Hence, when I talk about the digital information news environment, I am talking about how there needs to be a conducive atmosphere for credible information to resonate with the people the Author assumes that:
Correct Answer :
Both a) and b)
Solution :
The correct answer is Both a) and b).
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Analyzing the Context of the Statement:
The author states: "Hence, when I talk about the digital information news environment, I am talking about how there needs to be a conducive atmosphere for credible information to resonate with the people." This statement follows the author's discussion on the challenges posed by digitalisation, misinformation, disinformation, and social media forwards that override evidence-based journalism.
2. Evaluating Option a ("The Digital news is neither evidence based nor data driven"):
The author notes that in the digital information environment, people often trust social media forwards more than "evidence-based, data-driven journalism." Thus, when highlighting the need for a "conducive atmosphere for credible information," the author assumes that current digital news environments suffer from a lack of evidence-based and data-driven journalism due to confirmation bias and conspiracy theories.
3. Evaluating Option b ("The Digital journalism does not help people in making informed choices"):
Earlier in the passage, the author highlights that analog journalism complemented functions like bearing witness and making sense to "help people make informed choices." By contrast, the digital environment requires deliberate effort to create an atmosphere where credible information can resonate. This implies the assumption that digital journalism in its present state fails to help people make well-informed choices.
4. Conclusion:
Since both assumptions (a) and (b) underlie the author's statement, the correct option combining both logical deductions is Both a) and b).
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.
