Question Details

The rapid expansion of social media has reshaped democratic life in profound ways, functioning at once as a driver of public participation and a channel for strategic deception. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, once viewed mainly as spaces for personal sharing, have evolved into major arenas of political conversation. They allow citizens to voice opinions, rally around causes, and hold those in power accountable almost instantly. Since democracy depends on the circulation of ideas and information, social media appears to broaden access by weakening the control once exercised by traditional gatekeepers. Political figures can address voters directly without editorial mediation, and citizen-led movements can use viral momentum to bring neglected concerns into public focus. In moments of high political intensity —elections, mass protests, policy disputes —these platforms operate like a modern digital marketplace of ideas, enabling wider involvement than was previously possible through newspapers or public meetings. Yet this openness carries serious risks. The same networks that spread accurate information can also accelerate falsehoods, deepen polarization, and strengthen echo chambers through algorithmic reinforcement. In several democracies, electoral processes have been challenged by fake profiles, coordinated harassment, and organized disinformation efforts. Further, content designed to trigger emotion and maximize engagement often overshadows careful reasoning, turning political discussion into a noisy stream of anger and extremes. Hence, the influence of social media on democracy depends not only on technology, but also on the ethical rules that shape its use. Strong oversight, public media awareness, and transparency in how algorithms rank and recommend content are crucial if societies wish to gain the benefits while limiting the damage. Ultimately, social media is not automatically beneficial or harmful —it reflects collective choices. Whether it strengthens democratic stability or fuels distortion depends on how responsibly it is used by citizens, institutions, and the platforms themselves.


Why does the author describe social media as a “double-edged” force in democracy?

Options

A

It is inexpensive to use

B

It focuses mostly on images and videos

C

It spreads both reliable information and false narratives

D

It connects people globally

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option C

It spreads both reliable information and false narratives

Solution :

The correct answer is: It spreads both reliable information and false narratives.


Step-by-step Explanation:


1. Analyze the Passage:

The passage presents social media as having two contrasting sides:

- Positive aspects: It allows citizens to voice opinions, broadens access to information by bypassing traditional gatekeepers, enables direct political conversation, and helps organize citizen-led movements.

- Negative aspects: It accelerates falsehoods, deepens polarization, strengthens echo chambers, and enables fake profiles and organized disinformation campaigns.


2. Understand the "Double-Edged" Concept:

Describing something as a "double-edged" force means it possesses both positive/beneficial potential and negative/harmful risks simultaneously.


3. Evaluate the Options:

- Option 1 ("It is inexpensive to use"): Cost is not discussed as a reason for its dual nature in democratic processes.

- Option 2 ("It focuses mostly on images and videos"): The medium formats (images/videos) are not the primary focus of the political analysis in the text.

- Option 3 ("It spreads both reliable information and false narratives"): This directly captures the duality highlighted by the author—that the same platform spreading accurate information and enabling democratic participation can also accelerate falsehoods and disinformation.

- Option 4 ("It connects people globally"): While true in general, global connectivity alone does not capture the dual nature of spreading both good and harmful political information.


Therefore, the author views social media as a double-edged force primarily because it spreads both reliable information and false narratives.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...