The value of for and cannot be equal to
Correct Answer :
1
Solution :
The correct answer is 1. The expression can never equal 1. Here is a full, step-by-step derivation of why.
Step 1 — Expand each logarithm using the Quotient Rule
Recall that .
Applying this to the first term:
Applying this to the second term:
Step 2 — Add the two terms
The full expression becomes:
Step 3 — Introduce a substitution
Let . Since and , we know that .
By the change-of-base reciprocal identity:
So the expression simplifies to the function:
Step 4 — Find the maximum of f(t) using AM-GM Inequality
The AM-GM Inequality states that for any two positive real numbers and :
Applying this with and (both positive for ):
Therefore:
Multiplying both sides by (which flips the inequality):
Adding 2 to both sides:
That is:
Step 5 — Interpret the result
The expression is always less than or equal to 0 when and . The maximum value of 0 is achieved only when , i.e., when .
Now let's check the given options against this finding:
• 0: Achievable when . ✓
• −0.5: A negative value, so achievable. ✓
• −1: A negative value, so achievable. ✓
• 1: This is positive, which is strictly greater than the maximum possible value of 0. ✗ — impossible!
Conclusion: Since the expression for all valid , it can never equal 1. The correct answer is 1.
Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.
Create, conduct, and manage professional online assessments with Mindyard. Perfect for teachers and institutes.
Copyright © 2026 Mindyard. All Rights Reserved.