Which one of the following is not a feature to Indian federalism?

The correct answer is: It is the result of an agreement among the federating units.

Explanation and Analysis:

Indian federalism has several distinctive features, but it differs significantly from federal systems like that of the United States.

1. Not the Result of an Agreement: Unlike the United States, where independent states came together through an agreement to form a federation, the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among states. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar stated in the Constituent Assembly, no state has the right to secede from the Union of India. India is an "indestructible Union of destructible states." Therefore, stating that it is the result of an agreement is not a feature of Indian federalism.

2. Independent Judiciary: The Indian Constitution provides for an independent and integrated judicial system headed by the Supreme Court to safeguard the Constitution and settle disputes between the Centre and the States.

3. Division of Powers: The Constitution clearly demarcates executive and legislative powers between the Union (Centre) and the States through three lists in the Seventh Schedule: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List.

4. Unequal Representation in Rajya Sabha: Unlike the US Senate, where every state gets equal representation regardless of size, seats in India's Rajya Sabha (Council of States) are allocated to states based on their population (as per the Fourth Schedule).

Hence, the option claiming that Indian federalism is the result of an agreement among federating units is incorrect regarding Indian federalism, making it the correct answer to this question.