With reference to the Constitution of India, prohibition or limitations or provisions contained in ordinary laws cannot act as prohibitions or limitations on the constitutional powers under Article 142. It could mean which one of the following?

The correct answer is: The Supreme Court of India is not constrained in the exercise of its powers by laws made by the Parliament.

Explanation:

1. Understanding Article 142:
Article 142 of the Constitution of India provides the Supreme Court with broad inherent powers to pass any decree or make any order necessary for doing "complete justice" in any cause or matter pending before it.

2. Primacy of Constitutional Powers over Ordinary Laws:
The statement "prohibition or limitations or provisions contained in ordinary laws cannot act as prohibitions or limitations on the constitutional powers under Article 142" signifies that statutory provisions passed by Parliament or State Legislatures cannot override or limit the plenary powers granted to the Supreme Court directly by the Constitution.

3. Conclusion:
Thus, while exercising its powers under Article 142 to deliver complete justice, the Supreme Court is not bound or constrained by ordinary statutory limitations created by Parliament.