Question Details

XXII. In this moment, the developed countries — I point to them, because these countries have already burnt massive amounts of carbon dioxide for energy to build their economies — are faced with a real energy conundrum. On the one hand, developed countries are battered because of a fast-heating planet; temperatures have gone through the roof; droughts and extreme weather events are hitting them as well. On the other hand, ordinary people in these countries are worried, not just because of climate change but because of the lack of energy to heat their homes this coming winter. In the US, gas prices went up in summer, so much so that people travelled less and consumption of fuel dropped. But now prices are down and it is business as usual.
The fact is that this energy disruption has provided the much-needed vault to the beleaguered fossil fuel industry. Governments are asking this industry to supply more. Europe has baptised natural gas, a fossil fuel less polluting than coal but still a major emitter of carbon dioxide, as “clean”. The US has passed a climate bill, which will invest in renewable energy but conditional to increased spends on oil and gas and the opening up of millions of hectares of federal land for drilling. Through this bill the US will do more than ever before to build a manufacturing base for renewable energy, particularly solar. Europe, even in this desperate scramble for gas, is working to ramp up its investment in renewable power. So, it is the worst of times. It could be the best of times, but there are some caveats. One, this renewed interest in fossil fuels must remain temporary and transient. Given the nature of economies, once the investment has been made in this new infrastructure or the supply of fossil fuel has increased from new oil and gas discoveries, it will be difficult to wean off. Two, these countries should not be entitled to more use of fossil fuels in our world of shrunk carbon budgets. They need to reduce emissions drastically and leave whatever little carbon budget space that is remaining to poorer countries to use, thereby satisfying such poorer countries’ demands. [Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “New energy conundrum”, by Sunita Narain, DownToEarth]


Which of the following, if true, would resolve the ‘conundrum’ the author says developed countries face now?

Options

A

The development of adequate renewable power sources in the near term that would lead to a reduction in consumption of fossil fuels.

B

Finding new sources of fossil fuels that will ensure there is no shortage of energy to heat homes in the winter.

C

Switching immediately to renewable power sources, even if it leads to a shortage in energy supply for people.

D

Providing adequate aid to poorer countries so that they can develop renewable power sources for their use.

Show Answer

Correct Answer :

Option A

The development of adequate renewable power sources in the near term that would lead to a reduction in consumption of fossil fuels.

Solution :

Correct Answer: The development of adequate renewable power sources in the near term that would lead to a reduction in consumption of fossil fuels.


Step-by-Step Explanation:


1. Understanding the 'Conundrum':
According to the passage, developed countries face a two-fold energy conundrum:
- Side 1: They are facing severe climate impacts (rising temperatures, droughts, extreme weather) caused by burning massive amounts of fossil fuels.
- Side 2: Ordinary citizens are worried about an immediate lack of energy/fuel to meet basic needs (such as heating their homes in winter).
Thus, the core conundrum is balancing immediate energy demands without exacerbating climate change through increased reliance on fossil fuels.


2. Evaluating the Options:


- Option 1: "The development of adequate renewable power sources in the near term that would lead to a reduction in consumption of fossil fuels."
This option directly addresses both sides of the dilemma. Developing adequate renewable power in the near term satisfies immediate energy needs (solving Side 2) while reducing fossil fuel consumption and mitigating climate change (solving Side 1). Therefore, this resolves the conundrum effectively.


- Option 2: "Finding new sources of fossil fuels that will ensure there is no shortage of energy to heat homes in the winter."
While this addresses immediate energy shortages, it worsens the climate crisis by burning more fossil fuels, deepening the conundrum rather than resolving it.


- Option 3: "Switching immediately to renewable power sources, even if it leads to a shortage in energy supply for people."
This solves the climate issue but ignores the public's immediate energy shortage, failing to resolve the conflict between the two competing pressures.


- Option 4: "Providing adequate aid to poorer countries so that they can develop renewable power sources for their use."
Although beneficial globally, this does not directly address the energy shortage or climate challenges faced domestically by developed countries in the near term.


Conclusion:
Developing adequate renewable energy sources in the near term bridges the gap between meeting immediate heating/power needs and reducing carbon emissions, successfully resolving the author's described conundrum.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

  • CLAT
  • intermediate
  • 2 hours
  • current affairs, english, general knowledge, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, quant

Ask AI Tutor
5 left
Q1 View Question & Options
AI Tutor is solving this question...
Reading question context & options...